Home
Random
Recent changes
Special pages
Community portal
Preferences
About Sundering
Disclaimers
Sundering
Search
User menu
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Patches
|
Items
|
Quests
|
Creatures
|
Dungeons
|
NPCs
Attributes
|
Skills
|
Titles
|
XP Augmentation
|
Luminance Augmentation
|
Tailoring
Character Creation
β’
New Player Guide
β’
User Interface
β’
Glossary
Editing
Stormwaltz 2016 Q&A/Full Q&A
(section)
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Question 33: Identity of the Imperator == {{Turbine Developer | Date = September, 2016 | Link = '''No''' | Question = Who/what was the Imperator, the leader of the Virindi kingdom? Was it supposed to be a known Virindi from AC1βs lore, or was it a new character? | Text = When I left in 2002, it hadn't been decided. <br /><br /> It's important to understand the difference in content processes between the two games. AC1's story was built from the bottom up, haphazardly. Though there was a background to inspire and pull details from, it existed as documents on a server, divorced from the design of gameplay systems. In practice individual content developers added small details that eventually piled up into the greater whole. <br /><br /> There's no particular lore to the original magic system of reagents, for example. It was just an interesting mechanic. Likewise there was no overarching plan to AC1's pre-launch content design. When people had spare time they'd crack open the worldbuilding tools, pick a spot on the landscape or an empty dungeon template, and slap things together to see what worked - what looked ''interesting''. <br /><br /> AC2's story was built top-down, with structural goals and content approaches determined at an extremely high level of the company, and lore rationalizations left for content developers to work out later -- which is the way it ''normally'' works in game development. AC1 was made by a startup full of recent college grads shipping their first game and playing it by ear in every imaginable way. <br /><br /> There was a desire to make the story of AC2 more intuitive and understandable. AC1's lore was and is convoluted, bizarre, full of greeble-y details, and often deliberately built at a tangent to conventional fantasy tropes. <br /><br /> If I had the skills I do now, I could have boiled AC1's story down to digestible trope-spaces. Fourteen years ago I thought nearly every detail was important, so when someone asked me, "what's the story?" I'd vomit up a wall of text and made-up names, and they'd walk away shaking their head. | Developer = [[Turbine Developers#Chris "Stormwaltz" L'Etoile|Chris "Stormwaltz" L'Etoile]] }}
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Sundering may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Sundering:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
If you're new to the wiki, please take a moment to review our
Naming Conventions
and
Page Templates
. Using proper article names and image formats/sizes keep the wiki clean and helps avoid duplicate entries. Thanks!