Template talk:News: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:sounds like a good idea. So in the title, we link to the post/thread where the dev comment was made? And we do not link to our archive of it on the news item? --[[User:An Adventurer|An Adventurer]] 16:52, October 15, 2009 (UTC) | :sounds like a good idea. So in the title, we link to the post/thread where the dev comment was made? And we do not link to our archive of it on the news item? --[[User:An Adventurer|An Adventurer]] 16:52, October 15, 2009 (UTC) | ||
::Could be either one, I've been terrible about keeping those current though, I was working on a script to grab and post the dev comments to make it easier but haven't finished it yet. Probably just linking to the original comment would be easiest. --{{User:Tlosk/Sig}} 17:10, October 15, 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:10, 15 October 2009
Do you think it would be better to just link directly to developer comments and have an brief summary, rather than reproduce the entire comment (we would still have the dev comments in full on the announcements page of the month it was made) since it seems like it could quickly clutter things up since it's on the main page. --Tlosk talk contr 16:47, October 15, 2009 (UTC)
- sounds like a good idea. So in the title, we link to the post/thread where the dev comment was made? And we do not link to our archive of it on the news item? --An Adventurer 16:52, October 15, 2009 (UTC)