mNo edit summary
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Yeah, I'll help out.
== Response ==


I have a question though about the retired/old/previous versions of monsters. I didn't see any standard naming convention for these. Retired, old, and previous all seem to be used, so I was wondering if there was a standard for that. 05:49, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, I'll help out. (There's a lot more than I thought. <_<)
 
I have a question though about the retired/old/previous versions of monsters. I didn't see any standard naming convention for these. Retired, old, and previous all seem to be used, so I was wondering if there was a standard for that. --[[User:ZakielKugel|ZakielKugel]] 05:50, November 20, 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 05:57, 20 November 2009

Response Edit

Yeah, I'll help out. (There's a lot more than I thought. <_<)

I have a question though about the retired/old/previous versions of monsters. I didn't see any standard naming convention for these. Retired, old, and previous all seem to be used, so I was wondering if there was a standard for that. --ZakielKugel 05:50, November 20, 2009 (UTC)