mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Response == | |||
I have a question though about the retired/old/previous versions of monsters. I didn't see any standard naming convention for these. Retired, old, and previous all seem to be used, so I was wondering if there was a standard for that. 05: | Yeah, I'll help out. (There's a lot more than I thought. <_<) | ||
I have a question though about the retired/old/previous versions of monsters. I didn't see any standard naming convention for these. Retired, old, and previous all seem to be used, so I was wondering if there was a standard for that. --[[User:ZakielKugel|ZakielKugel]] 05:50, November 20, 2009 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 05:57, 20 November 2009
Response Edit
Yeah, I'll help out. (There's a lot more than I thought. <_<)
I have a question though about the retired/old/previous versions of monsters. I didn't see any standard naming convention for these. Retired, old, and previous all seem to be used, so I was wondering if there was a standard for that. --ZakielKugel 05:50, November 20, 2009 (UTC)