Talk:Attuned: Difference between revisions
(looking for some input here, what do you guys think) |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
--[[User:Tlosk|Tlosk]] 20:47, 1 May 2008 (CDT)Sounds good to me. | |||
---- | |||
Attuned = item can not be dropped/given, bonded = item will not drop on death, correct? | |||
I don't think it would hurt to add them as a category tag to items that have them. In fact, it might be a good idea to do that for every special property, and have the category page contain the description of the property. And then the special property listing on the item's description would no longer be a link (this is something that was sort of an issue with a new item template tlosk created). | |||
Another option... On the attuned/bonded pages, create a link to the "what links here" pages for attuned/bonded, which would create a list of all the items that are attuned/bonded and have it as a link. Although, I think the category idea is better. | |||
--[[User:An Adventurer|An Adventurer]] 22:07, 30 April 2008 (CDT) | |||
---- | |||
I think it may be a good idea to make attuned and bonded into their own categories, this way when people are looking for attuned items they can simply look up the category. Seems like a good idea to me, would be useful for people looking to start on DT or just going red on a npk server maybe? What do you guys think?--[[User:Sanguis|Sanguis]] 20:42, 30 April 2008 (CDT) | I think it may be a good idea to make attuned and bonded into their own categories, this way when people are looking for attuned items they can simply look up the category. Seems like a good idea to me, would be useful for people looking to start on DT or just going red on a npk server maybe? What do you guys think?--[[User:Sanguis|Sanguis]] 20:42, 30 April 2008 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 01:47, 2 May 2008
--Tlosk 20:47, 1 May 2008 (CDT)Sounds good to me.
Attuned = item can not be dropped/given, bonded = item will not drop on death, correct?
I don't think it would hurt to add them as a category tag to items that have them. In fact, it might be a good idea to do that for every special property, and have the category page contain the description of the property. And then the special property listing on the item's description would no longer be a link (this is something that was sort of an issue with a new item template tlosk created).
Another option... On the attuned/bonded pages, create a link to the "what links here" pages for attuned/bonded, which would create a list of all the items that are attuned/bonded and have it as a link. Although, I think the category idea is better. --An Adventurer 22:07, 30 April 2008 (CDT)
I think it may be a good idea to make attuned and bonded into their own categories, this way when people are looking for attuned items they can simply look up the category. Seems like a good idea to me, would be useful for people looking to start on DT or just going red on a npk server maybe? What do you guys think?--Sanguis 20:42, 30 April 2008 (CDT)