|
|
| (44 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| == Templates ==
| | #REDIRECT [[User talk:Atarax]] |
| That's a good idea, to avoid agreement issues (a/an etc) I made it so it just says "* <Name> Locations." and added it the creature template. As I'm going through the old creature entries and changing them I've come across quite a few that were either missing the plural name all together or weren't pluralized so this will make it a lot better.
| |
| | |
| You can use a variable more than once, what did you have in mind?--[[User:Tlosk|Tlosk]] 13:08, 23 January 2009 (CST)
| |
| | |
| :I started a central location to have ongoing discussions where we can discuss things directly or link to the talk page. [[Forum]]. --[[User:Tlosk|Tlosk]] 08:37, 24 January 2009 (CST)
| |
| | |
| == Spells ==
| |
| <br>Unique spells like that can have their own page, marked as Category:Unlearnable Castable Spell. The only time that a unique quest only spell should redirect to a standard spell page is when it has an effect that can be seen to stack with or surpass regular spells. For example, there are many quest only cantrips (like on the living weapons, or the spear of purity) but these can be proven to stack or override standard spells and cantrips.
| |
| <br><br>So in short, most unique quest/item spells that mimic a life, creature, or item spell/cantrip will redirect to the appropriate page. Unique war and offensive life spells will have an individual page. And I think, for now at least, most of those special boss only debuffs should have unique pages, since many of them do not have a standard spell counterpart, and it is also rather difficult to find what standard debuffs they do stack with. --[[User:An Adventurer|An Adventurer]] 18:30, 19 December 2008 (CST)
| |
| | |
| == Dispels ==
| |
| I was thinking that all dispels (castable and on gems) would all have a unique spell pages. The castable versions would be tagged with category:spell and category:<school> spell. And then all would be tagged with category:Dispel. --[[User:An Adventurer|An Adventurer]] 16:11, 8 January 2009 (CST)
| |
| | |
| :My reasoning is that all the spells are named differently, and not <name> I, II, III, etc. But I suppose redirecting them will work, assuming they follow a pattern with spell comps/spell words. --[[User:An Adventurer|An Adventurer]] 16:56, 8 January 2009 (CST)
| |
| | |
| ::Yeah looks like the castable+learnable dispels can be redirects like standard spells. --[[User:An Adventurer|An Adventurer]] 17:28, 8 January 2009 (CST)
| |
| | |
| :::The dispels look fine. Thanks for helping out on the redirects too. --[[User:An Adventurer|An Adventurer]] 14:06, 9 January 2009 (CST)
| |
| | |
| == Cantrips ==
| |
| I've started a [[Cantrip Template|cantrip template here]]. We'll use the talk page there to discuss improvements. --[[User:An Adventurer|An Adventurer]] 13:10, 23 January 2009 (CST)
| |