No edit summary
(Redirected page to User talk:Dr Doom)
 
(16 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Think of the Missing Pages link more as a tool that is useful to find things that could be added than as a page that is ideally empty. For that reason leaving ?? as a link makes them easy to find and they should be left as links. The Sold By links will always be empty pages, they are a trick we're using to provide segregated lists of links. We're just now starting to use them and until we've updated most of the shopkeepers to the new NPC Shopkeeper template we won't be activating the final template that makes use of them. That probably doesn't make much sense, it might be easier to see a link that is an example for Comfrey Peas:
#Redirect [[User_talk:Dr Doom]]
 
* Sold by [[:Special:Whatlinkshere/Comfrey Pea/Sold By|one or more shopkeepers.]]
 
Normally a whatlinkshere link would display all links, including patch pages, spell formulas, etc. The link above though only displays shopkeepers. We'll be using this type of link for creatures also (for location lists in dungeons, terrain spawns, etc). So you can just ignore missing pages that are sub pages of another article.
 
Oh and when you sign comments you can use the signature button, the second to the last just above the edit box, it'll insert <nowiki>--~~~~</nowiki> which will be converted to a link to your user page and a time stamp when the edit is saved. It makes it easier to reply, thanks. --[[User:Tlosk|Tlosk]] 02:13, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 
----
 
Hiya, I'll do some tests and see what I can get working. Also could you give me an example of a page where it would be used and a list of the items that would be included as an example to make sure I'm thinking the same you are?
 
For the xp table, if it's a fixed amount for everyone, don't use the xp table at all, just delete that section and set Link XP to false (the xp will be still be displayed in the summary table at the top). The reason we made the XP section and table was to provide a place for detailed information on level %, maxes, repeats, multiple tasks and that wouldn't all fit nicely in the summary table. So for most quests, especially older ones, they won't need the XP section since it's just a single value. Though there may be some cases where we'd want a table but not have the % of level column, I'm pretty sure I can't pull columns in the middle, just end columns (like with repeat differs) but I'll see what I can do. --[[User:Tlosk|Tlosk]] 21:54, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 
: I should add that for quests with no xp reward cut out the xp section also, link xp false, and in the xp put "None". --[[User:Tlosk|Tlosk]] 22:24, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 
:: Can you just make it so anything with a blank parameter doesn't get put into the table?  -- RR
 
::: The reason a blank entry gives ?? is for some quests, often new ones, we don't know for a while whether they are % or flat xp (or when writing up an old or retired quest from notes from other sources, until you can get in game to verify things). And that signifies more information is needed. However if I do find a way to make middle columns conditional I'll add another parameter like the repeat boolean.
 
::: I agree that would be nice to have the tables update themselves as things are added. Our directory pages like [[Dungeons]], [[Quests]], [[Weapons]], along with those you mentioned are hard to keep up to date as we are back-filling old content. We're actually getting pretty close now to have content from old patches complete and once that's done the pages will be a lot easier to keep up to date since we'll just have to add each months new content when a new patch comes. I've got a few ideas though I'm testing on a local copy of the wiki, but you're right, it won't be simple hehe. But it would be a very useful thing to have. --[[User:Tlosk|Tlosk]] 09:28, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 
----
 
Just wanted to say thanks a lot for working on improving the starter quest guides. Its been something I have been meaning to do but never got around to. --[[User:An Adventurer|An Adventurer]] 19:43, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
<br><br>
It has been my pleasure - I figured it was a good way to get used to working with the tools and templates on the site.  :)  --RR

Latest revision as of 15:34, 21 July 2012

Redirect to: