Talk:Text Template: Difference between revisions
(New page: Why would it be a good idea to download, rename and reupload icon's if they are just the same as other text's? I mean, wouldnt that be a waste of server resources and bandwidth? --~~~~) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
We set icon pages to redirect to that page, so clicking on the icon brings you to the item instead of a description page for a generic image. | |||
So for example, the icon [[:Image:Altar of Asheron Rumor Icon.png]] will have its page content set to <nowiki>#redirect [[Altar of Asheron Rumor]]</nowiki> | |||
--[[User:An Adventurer|An Adventurer]] 10:22, 23 September 2008 (CDT) | |||
---- | |||
Why would it be a good idea to download, rename and reupload icon's if they are just the same as other text's? I mean, wouldnt that be a waste of server resources and bandwidth? | Why would it be a good idea to download, rename and reupload icon's if they are just the same as other text's? I mean, wouldnt that be a waste of server resources and bandwidth? | ||
--[[User:Jedismj|Jedismj]] 09:10, 23 September 2008 (CDT) | --[[User:Jedismj|Jedismj]] 09:10, 23 September 2008 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 15:22, 23 September 2008
We set icon pages to redirect to that page, so clicking on the icon brings you to the item instead of a description page for a generic image.
So for example, the icon Image:Altar of Asheron Rumor Icon.png will have its page content set to #redirect [[Altar of Asheron Rumor]] --An Adventurer 10:22, 23 September 2008 (CDT)
Why would it be a good idea to download, rename and reupload icon's if they are just the same as other text's? I mean, wouldnt that be a waste of server resources and bandwidth?
--Jedismj 09:10, 23 September 2008 (CDT)