Talk:Spells: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
So for example - Minor Focus, Moderate Focus, Major Focus, Epic Focus, Brilliance, Concentration, and any other spell that effects focus and stacks with standard spells will redirect to <nowiki>[[Focus (Cantrip)]]</nowiki>. We will then need to create a page template for cantrips, but it is on this page that we would list the full stacking effects. --[[User:An Adventurer|An Adventurer]] 15:22, 15 November 2008 (CST) | So for example - Minor Focus, Moderate Focus, Major Focus, Epic Focus, Brilliance, Concentration, and any other spell that effects focus and stacks with standard spells will redirect to <nowiki>[[Focus (Cantrip)]]</nowiki>. We will then need to create a page template for cantrips, but it is on this page that we would list the full stacking effects. --[[User:An Adventurer|An Adventurer]] 15:22, 15 November 2008 (CST) | ||
:: I've found some cantrips that have spell entries already, like Prodigal Strength. I went ahead and redirected [[Prodigal Strength]] to [[Strength (Cantrip)]], and also copied the spell description, etc... over to that page. Can you take a look and make sure this is how we want to do it before I start migrating all these spells over? | :: I've found some cantrips that have spell entries already, like Prodigal Strength. I went ahead and redirected [[Prodigal Strength]] to [[Strength (Cantrip)]], and also copied the spell description, etc... over to that page. Can you take a look and make sure this is how we want to do it before I start migrating all these spells over? Perhaps we should come up with a standardized ''Cantrip Template'' before moving all these over. | ||
:: Also, I think the ''Spell Stacking'' section that is currently on the [[Strength]] page, might get lost in the shuffle if we are using both pages to track Spell Stacking. Perhaps we should put ''Spell Stacking'' on the [[Strength (Spell)]] page and ''Cantrip Stacking'' on the [[Strength (Cantrip)]] page. This way we can just link to both from the [[Strength]] page, and its easier to update in the future. What do you think? --[[User:Atarax|Atarax]] 11:45, 18 December 2008 (CST) | |||
== Spells as Entries == | == Spells as Entries == | ||
Revision as of 17:48, 18 December 2008
Listing of Cantrips
I believe I have a solution for the listing of cantrips. We will simply use the same system as my standard spell sorting system. Every cantrip, regardless of what cantrip tier/category it belongs to, will redirect to a page for the stat it effects.
So for example - Minor Focus, Moderate Focus, Major Focus, Epic Focus, Brilliance, Concentration, and any other spell that effects focus and stacks with standard spells will redirect to [[Focus (Cantrip)]]. We will then need to create a page template for cantrips, but it is on this page that we would list the full stacking effects. --An Adventurer 15:22, 15 November 2008 (CST)
- I've found some cantrips that have spell entries already, like Prodigal Strength. I went ahead and redirected Prodigal Strength to Strength (Cantrip), and also copied the spell description, etc... over to that page. Can you take a look and make sure this is how we want to do it before I start migrating all these spells over? Perhaps we should come up with a standardized Cantrip Template before moving all these over.
- Also, I think the Spell Stacking section that is currently on the Strength page, might get lost in the shuffle if we are using both pages to track Spell Stacking. Perhaps we should put Spell Stacking on the Strength (Spell) page and Cantrip Stacking on the Strength (Cantrip) page. This way we can just link to both from the Strength page, and its easier to update in the future. What do you think? --Atarax 11:45, 18 December 2008 (CST)
Spells as Entries
I have come up with a solution to finding spells on items. Every spell listed on an item will be a link. By going to the spell's page, you can click on the what links here to find all items with that spell. The task now is to update all old items, and also create spell pages. --An Adventurer 19:48, 20 October 2008 (CDT)
- Update: Standard Spell Template is complete. The Sandbox is currently being used to create redirect pages for all standard spells. --An Adventurer 15:22, 15 November 2008 (CST)
Old Discussion
Should we change the quest spell section to link to the category, quest spell? Quest Spells --Jedismj 01:02, 31 August 2008 (CDT)
The format looks great, very clean and readable. --Tlosk 08:52, 18 August 2008 (CDT)
Gouru Format for Critter spells look good to me. Please be sure to login when doing edits :)