User talk:Tlosk: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I think the [[Quest Guide Template]] isn't mirroring the actual wiki template, because the Level Req, Suggested Level, and Introduced In fragments aren't parsed properly (I had to copy the code from the [[Shadowfire Stone (Quest)]]. I probably shouldn't even be using this template because were in the middle of an update, but temporarily it might be a good idea to revert it back to the old HTML template. --[[User:Atarax|Atarax]] 15:20, 10 February 2009 (CST) | I think the [[Quest Guide Template]] isn't mirroring the actual wiki template, because the Level Req, Suggested Level, and Introduced In fragments aren't parsed properly (I had to copy the code from the [[Shadowfire Stone (Quest)]]. I probably shouldn't even be using this template because were in the middle of an update, but temporarily it might be a good idea to revert it back to the old HTML template. --[[User:Atarax|Atarax]] 15:20, 10 February 2009 (CST) | ||
---- | |||
Do you know if there's a way in the wiki, or some plugin/addon, that allows us to "Move" or "Rename" uploaded images? Currently we have to delete and re-upload them, even if its just a typo. Just curious if this is possible, maybe in the new version? --[[User:Atarax|Atarax]] 11:56, 11 February 2009 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 17:56, 11 February 2009
Feel free to post questions or leave suggestions in this space (click Edit Tab, need to be logged in):
I think the Quest Guide Template isn't mirroring the actual wiki template, because the Level Req, Suggested Level, and Introduced In fragments aren't parsed properly (I had to copy the code from the Shadowfire Stone (Quest). I probably shouldn't even be using this template because were in the middle of an update, but temporarily it might be a good idea to revert it back to the old HTML template. --Atarax 15:20, 10 February 2009 (CST)
Do you know if there's a way in the wiki, or some plugin/addon, that allows us to "Move" or "Rename" uploaded images? Currently we have to delete and re-upload them, even if its just a typo. Just curious if this is possible, maybe in the new version? --Atarax 11:56, 11 February 2009 (CST)