Forum:Should retired items be split from current?: Difference between revisions
m (just added the extra colon for it to appear) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| Indent = : | | Indent = : | ||
| Text = Was just looking through the [[:Category:Retired]], and noticed a lot of stuff you can still obtain in there, maybe it would be less confusing to people if they were split. --[[User:Immortalbob|Immortalbob]] 18:34, January 2, 2010 (UTC) | | Text = Was just looking through the [[:Category:Retired]], and noticed a lot of stuff you can still obtain in there, maybe it would be less confusing to people if they were split. --[[User:Immortalbob|Immortalbob]] 18:34, January 2, 2010 (UTC) | ||
}} | |||
{{Post | |||
| Indent = : | |||
| Text = Yeah, can't the items that have new icons, stats and/or artwork have a 'older version' category or something maybe? | |||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 18:51, 2 January 2010
Was just looking through the Category:Retired, and noticed a lot of stuff you can still obtain in there, maybe it would be less confusing to people if they were split. --Immortalbob 18:34, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, can't the items that have new icons, stats and/or artwork have a 'older version' category or something maybe?