Forum:Should retired items be split from current?: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
{{Post | {{Post | ||
| Indent = :: | | Indent = :: | ||
| Text = I was thinking that they should be moved to [[Item Name(Retired)]]}} | | Text = I was thinking that they should be moved to [[Item Name(Retired)]] --[[User:Immortalbob|Immortalbob]] 19:29, January 2, 2010 (UTC)}} |
Revision as of 19:29, 2 January 2010
Was just looking through the Category:Retired, and noticed a lot of stuff you can still obtain in there, maybe it would be less confusing to people if they were split. --Immortalbob 18:34, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, can't the items that have new icons, stats and/or artwork have a 'older version' category or something maybe?
I was thinking that they should be moved to Item Name(Retired) --Immortalbob 19:29, January 2, 2010 (UTC)