Forum:Should retired items be split from current?: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 20:26, 2 January 2010

Forums: Index →

→ Forum:Should retired items be split from current?

Was just looking through the Category:Retired, and noticed a lot of stuff you can still obtain in there, maybe it would be less confusing to people if they were split. --Immortalbob 18:34, January 2, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, can't the items that have new icons, stats and/or artwork have a 'older version' category or something maybe? --Tiger1986 18:51, January 2, 2010 (UTC)

I was thinking that they should be moved to Item Name (Retired) --Immortalbob 19:29, January 2, 2010 (UTC)

I think that would work well. The multiitem pages have been awkward to construct in a consistent manner. I'll make a crosslink template for tying related pages together. --Tlosk talk contr 20:13, January 2, 2010 (UTC)

Maybe just link to the old/new version in the notes? --Immortalbob 20:26, January 2, 2010 (UTC)

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 {{Post
   | Indent = :::::
-  | Text = Maybe just link to the old/new version in the notes?
+  | Text = Maybe just link to the old/new version in the notes? --[[User:Immortalbob|Immortalbob]] 20:26, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
 }}