Tethana's Response: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
From the [[Quest]] quest, introduced during the [[Friend and Foe]] event. | From the [[Quest]] quest, introduced during the [[Friend and Foe]] event. | ||
Dropped by the [[Viamontian Man-at-Arms]] at 5.9N 69.0W. | |||
<div style="background-color:#EEE8AA; border:2px solid #cc9900;width:80%;padding:30px;margin-bottom:20px;margin-left:5%;margin-right:10%;"> | <div style="background-color:#EEE8AA; border:2px solid #cc9900;width:80%;padding:30px;margin-bottom:20px;margin-left:5%;margin-right:10%;"> | ||
Revision as of 18:33, 10 August 2008
From the Quest quest, introduced during the Friend and Foe event. Dropped by the Viamontian Man-at-Arms at 5.9N 69.0W.
Tethana's Response
In the absence of Commander Jared Kurth, I have assumed command of Fort Tethana. Your terms may sound generous, but the rumors surrounding Commander Kurth's disappearance are very ominous portents for those who join the Viamontian forces. I do not consider your current proposal sufficient to take such a risk with the men under my command. This is not to say that there is no possibility for a future alliance, but you will need to substantially improve your proposal for it to outweigh the possible negatives of an alliance with Sanamar.