Talk:NPC Template: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think we should update the NPC template to be grey like the quest template, it looks outdated. Also, I think the "route" entry is not really necessary, and in many situations is much too long for the space provided, which clutters the page. --[[User:Atarax|Atarax]] 10:38, 17 December 2008 (CST) | I think we should update the NPC template to be grey like the quest template, it looks outdated. Also, I think the "route" entry is not really necessary, and in many situations is much too long for the space provided, which clutters the page. --[[User:Atarax|Atarax]] 10:38, 17 December 2008 (CST) | ||
: I agree it should be updated, though I know the route is an oft used item (copy and paste to give to someone when they ask how to get to someone). --[[User:Tlosk|Tlosk]] 14:24, 17 December 2008 (CST) | |||
---- | ---- | ||
Revision as of 20:24, 17 December 2008
I think we should update the NPC template to be grey like the quest template, it looks outdated. Also, I think the "route" entry is not really necessary, and in many situations is much too long for the space provided, which clutters the page. --Atarax 10:38, 17 December 2008 (CST)
- I agree it should be updated, though I know the route is an oft used item (copy and paste to give to someone when they ask how to get to someone). --Tlosk 14:24, 17 December 2008 (CST)
We should create a vendor specific NPC template. Things to consider: should items listed just be links? Should we include icons? Pyreal cost? And should all items be listed in a single column (by item category) or in a multi-column table, like the Hero Tokens listings.
Here are some examples of vendor styles we have:
--An Adventurer 17:36, 19 September 2008 (CDT)