Talk:Melee Weapon Template: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
{|cellpadding=2 | {|cellpadding=2 | ||
!align=center| Current Version || Retired Version | !align=center| Current Version || Retired Version | ||
|- | |-valign=top | ||
| | |||
{{Melee Weapon | {{Melee Weapon | ||
| Weapon Type = | | Weapon Type = | ||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
| Mana Cost = | | Mana Cost = | ||
}} | }} | ||
| | |||
{{Melee Weapon | {{Melee Weapon | ||
| Weapon Type = | | Weapon Type = | ||
| Name = | | Name = Corndog Sword | ||
| Value = | | Value = 15 | ||
| Burden = | | Burden = 200 | ||
| Icon Image = Icon.png | | Icon Image = Icon.png | ||
| Live Image = Live.jpg | | Live Image = Live.jpg | ||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
| Description = | | Description = | ||
| Special Properties = | | Special Properties = | ||
| Damage = | | Damage = 25 - 85 | ||
| Buffed Damage = | | Buffed Damage = | ||
| Element = | | Element = Slashing | ||
| Speed = | | Speed = 10 | ||
| Buffed Speed = | | Buffed Speed = | ||
| Bonus to Attack = | | Bonus to Attack = 5 | ||
| Buffed Attack = | | Buffed Attack = 5 | ||
| Bonus to Defense = | | Bonus to Defense = | ||
| Buffed Defense = | | Buffed Defense = | ||
Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
}} | }} | ||
|} | |} | ||
: I agree that looks nice for multiple versions, I think I've fixed all the breaking issues so it will display correctly. --[[User:Tlosk|Tlosk]] 06:14, 4 February 2009 (CST) |
Revision as of 12:14, 4 February 2009
can this wiki template handle multiple "ID panel" tabels placed within an invisible table, like my entry for Crystal Sword and other multi-version same-name items? If so, looks great to me. EDIT: Yeah, looks like it can.
However I see some issues with it now. There are many weapons, especially older quest weapons, that have no spells (edit, again, I see there is a no magic template). All store weapons have no description, along with a few quest weapons. Looks like when a field is left blank it leaves a line there. --An Adventurer 23:19, 3 February 2009 (CST)
Introduced: | ?? |
Current Version | Retired Version |
---|---|
- I agree that looks nice for multiple versions, I think I've fixed all the breaking issues so it will display correctly. --Tlosk 06:14, 4 February 2009 (CST)