Talk:Shopkeeper NPC Template: Difference between revisions
(New page: I'm not a big fan of how the inventory is laid out, more specifically, how the prices are displayed, i.e. 1amc. Do you guys think we could have a section above the inventory that show...) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm not a big fan of how the inventory is laid out, more specifically, how the prices are displayed, i.e. 1[[amc]]. Do you guys think we could have a section above the inventory that shows "currency", and then possibly a table below, similar to the XP rewards table, which shows "Items", "Price". This way we could just show the price without the currency next to it, keep everything in uniform line (throughout categories), and also allow for sorting. It may be overkill, but what do you guys think? I'll try to work up an example. --[[User:Atarax|Atarax]] 12:22, 6 March 2009 (CST) | I'm not a big fan of how the inventory is laid out, more specifically, how the prices are displayed, i.e. 1[[amc]]. Do you guys think we could have a section above the inventory that shows "currency", and then possibly a table below, similar to the XP rewards table, which shows "Items", "Price". This way we could just show the price without the currency next to it, keep everything in uniform line (throughout categories), and also allow for sorting. It may be overkill, but what do you guys think? I'll try to work up an example. --[[User:Atarax|Atarax]] 12:22, 6 March 2009 (CST) | ||
:I feel the same, I think that would look better, though the sorting can be tricky.--[[User:Tlosk|Tlosk]] 15:59, 7 March 2009 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 21:59, 7 March 2009
I'm not a big fan of how the inventory is laid out, more specifically, how the prices are displayed, i.e. 1amc. Do you guys think we could have a section above the inventory that shows "currency", and then possibly a table below, similar to the XP rewards table, which shows "Items", "Price". This way we could just show the price without the currency next to it, keep everything in uniform line (throughout categories), and also allow for sorting. It may be overkill, but what do you guys think? I'll try to work up an example. --Atarax 12:22, 6 March 2009 (CST)
- I feel the same, I think that would look better, though the sorting can be tricky.--Tlosk 15:59, 7 March 2009 (CST)