User talk:Tlosk: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(comments) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Hi Tlosk, still having issues with account migration? thanks --[[User:Dr_Doom_HG| Dr Doom HG]] ([[User_talk:Dr_Doom_HG|talk]]) 18:57, October 16, 2009 (UTC) | Hi Tlosk, still having issues with account migration? thanks --[[User:Dr_Doom_HG| Dr Doom HG]] ([[User_talk:Dr_Doom_HG|talk]]) 18:57, October 16, 2009 (UTC) | ||
: Thanks Tlosk, the migration finally came through. --[[User:Dr_Doom_HG| Dr Doom HG]] ([[User_talk:Dr_Doom_HG|talk]]) 16:24, October 19, 2009 (UTC) | |||
---- | ---- |
Revision as of 16:24, 19 October 2009
(Comments are cleared once addressed)
Feel free to post questions or leave suggestions in this space (click Edit Tab, need to be logged in):
Hi Tlosk, still having issues with account migration? thanks -- Dr Doom HG (talk) 18:57, October 16, 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks Tlosk, the migration finally came through. -- Dr Doom HG (talk) 16:24, October 19, 2009 (UTC)
Hiya, few questions about the patch tree template:
- I've noticed that all changes to items, creatures and quests are sometimes detailed on the more recent patch pages. I always just list the items under the correct heading (New quests, items, updated items etc) and then list the actual updates on the items own page or shall I use the former with the old trees?.
- After adding all those release notes, letters to the players etc I thought it would be nice to put some of the more important notes under "Other Updates". Shall I keep doing that or shall I just leave it with the links to the release notes and remove that sort of thing to keep the pages cleaner?.
- How do I know when to put a quest under the Updated Quests heading? how many of these changes constitute an updated quest?: new items, artwork/icons, level restrictions, creatures. I ask because because I will have to put a ton of the updates on the Quests By Patch page.
thanks again --Tiger1986 12:16, October 18, 2009 (UTC)