Forum:Should retired items be split from current?: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| Indent = ::::: | | Indent = ::::: | ||
| Text = Maybe just link to the old/new version in the notes? --[[User:Immortalbob|Immortalbob]] 20:26, January 2, 2010 (UTC) | | Text = Maybe just link to the old/new version in the notes? --[[User:Immortalbob|Immortalbob]] 20:26, January 2, 2010 (UTC) | ||
}} | |||
{{Post | |||
| Indent = ::::: | |||
| Text = The {{tl|Intro}} template can now display links to multiple retired versions as well as a link to the current version. | |||
For example [[Acid Axe]] and [[Acid Axe (Retired]]. | |||
--{{User:Tlosk/Sig}} 18:04, January 10, 2010 (UTC) | |||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 18:04, 10 January 2010
Was just looking through the Category:Retired, and noticed a lot of stuff you can still obtain in there, maybe it would be less confusing to people if they were split. --Immortalbob 18:34, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, can't the items that have new icons, stats and/or artwork have a 'older version' category or something maybe? --Tiger1986 18:51, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
I was thinking that they should be moved to Item Name (Retired) --Immortalbob 19:29, January 2, 2010 (UTC)
Maybe just link to the old/new version in the notes? --Immortalbob 20:26, January 2, 2010 (UTC)