User talk:Arkalor: Difference between revisions
(→Images) |
(→RE: Bureaucrat status: new section) |
||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
: It doesn't look like I can promote users to bots. We'll need to contact Wikia about it, it shouldn't be a big deal. --[[User:An Adventurer|An Adventurer]] ([[User talk:An Adventurer|talk]]) 03:03, November 19, 2014 (UTC) | : It doesn't look like I can promote users to bots. We'll need to contact Wikia about it, it shouldn't be a big deal. --[[User:An Adventurer|An Adventurer]] ([[User talk:An Adventurer|talk]]) 03:03, November 19, 2014 (UTC) | ||
== RE: Bureaucrat status == | |||
Abracadabra! You are now a bureaucrat :) --[[User:An Adventurer|An Adventurer]] ([[User talk:An Adventurer|talk]]) 14:06, November 21, 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:06, 21 November 2014
You can also PM me on Turbine's forums.
page vs category
Hey, I have noticed that a large number of pages are being moved from wiki pages to categories. Is there a reason for this? While categories are certainly useful since they are automagically maintained, I often found our manually maintained pages more useful.
For example, this old page http://ac.wikkii.net/w/index.php?title=Axes&oldid=369603 is much more useful to me, because of the sortable table, than http://ac.wikkii.net/wiki/Category:Heavy_Weapons, which just contains an alphabetical list.
Even if, for example, I am specifically looking for base 400 wield heavy weapons, I'd much rather have a sortable table than just the list of links at http://ac.wikkii.net/wiki/Category:Heavy_Weapons:_Wield_400 because a table could contain damage, damage type, special properties, etc.
I'm not saying that categories need to go away - they are certainly useful, but the information they present is rather limited.
--An Adventurer 03:41, 2 March 2014 (EST)
Re: Tooltips
Even if the public servers eventually close, an accurate wiki will be vital for the fan-run servers that Sev had talked about in his post. --An Adventurer 07:54, 2 March 2014 (EST)
Quest Guide Item Section
Hey Ark, I have another question for you.
I noticed that recently updated quest guides no longer have an item section, listing all items related to the quest (rumors, keys, rewards, etc). Is there a reason for the removal of this?
I've found this section to be useful, especially if I am going to a quest guide specifically to find a quick link to an item. --An Adventurer 05:43, 28 March 2014 (EST)
- I think most of the changes made to the quest guides have been good. The shortened and smaller quest summary is a good change.
- I guess I just like the visual aspect of icons - its easier for me to recognize, I guess. And I do think that a list of all related items would be useful. For example, there are a large number of intermediary items in the Composite Weapons Quest, and I don't think the guide would be easily rewritten to use a lot of text and tiny icons. Having a complete list of all items related to that quest on that quest's page seems like a useful thing to me. Likewise,
- Likewise, I also liked having the dialog from the quest appear in the colors it does in game. I actually recently added to the css so we could use classes instead of inline styling, you can see my examples here: User:An_Adventurer/Sandbox_2. IMO, visually being able to quickly identify the type of chat message is useful.
- As for wikia, no, I don't think I'd want to move back there, but it could be better maintained with more recent backups added so it is available as another resource. We should probably get an email going between the wiki admins to discuss this more. --An Adventurer 04:34, 29 March 2014 (EST)
Images
I haven't got a confirmation from wikia yet, but our file upload log is filled with uploads from maintenance script, and the spring 2014 patch has most of its images available now. So it looks like we've got wikkii.net as restored as it'll get. --An Adventurer (talk) 14:28, November 18, 2014 (UTC)
- It doesn't look like I can promote users to bots. We'll need to contact Wikia about it, it shouldn't be a big deal. --An Adventurer (talk) 03:03, November 19, 2014 (UTC)
RE: Bureaucrat status
Abracadabra! You are now a bureaucrat :) --An Adventurer (talk) 14:06, November 21, 2014 (UTC)